Compared with Q1 and Z6 meters, who is more cost-effective?

For our consumers, buying products is definitely the better the performance, the cheaper the better. However, if you want to start with a cost-effective projection, if you have a budget of 3,000 yuan, you would recommend the projectors, which are very hot, for everyone, and Q1 and Z6. So which of these two models is better for you? Here are some of the true comparisons and comparisons that we have shared for you. The following Hengping comments are fair and fair comparisons. We welcome everyone's supervision.

Appearance contrast:

In terms of appearance, it can be seen that both Q1 and Z6 are relatively mature products. Compared with the Q1 paintings, the appearance of Q1 is even more sophisticated. Q1 uses a unique wooden craft (the panel uses a wood craft, and the famous retro audio brand Elvis from the same factory) + wrapped cloth, full of MUJI wind affinity, let people have a better impression. The pole meter Z6 is made of plastic material, it looks relatively simple and compact.

Both are dual-lens designs. The dual-lens design of the Q1 is more iconic. Small for the sub-lens, this small lens has a great effect, including 4D auto trapezoidal correction, air-to-air touch operation, automatic focus and other functions are related.

Backside comparison: The two projectors have cooling vents on the back. The interface is the same. The Z6 uses a black and white lens. The Q1 uses a warp and weft woven cloth and wood texture. The semi-wrapped design not only produces a vocal effect, but also Increase heat dissipation dramatically.

The bottom of the comparison: God painting Q1 appearance is up and down the wood craft, and all meters Z6 are all designed with plastic material, both projectors are designed with bracket screw and anti-slip mat. The anti-slip mat of the Q1 painted by God uses an adjustable design. Even if it is placed on a non-horizontal table, it can be achieved by adjusting the height of the mat. This considerate detail design is worthy of praise.

Remote control comparison:

In the remote control, it is very curious to have a start. Why does the Q1 have two disc keys for remote control? After reading the official guide, we know that the original Q1 remote control supports two operation modes: touch control and conventional keys. Control. And God painted Q1 remote control also uses a battery design, more environmentally friendly, power consumption does not need to go to the store to buy batteries, USB charging port is universal, charging is very convenient. The polar meters Z6 remote control using the 7th battery, only supports the traditional button control.

Interface comparison:

Interfaces, the two projection interfaces have a USB2.0, an HDMI interface, a headphone jack, a more than a USB3.0 interface God draw Q1, this interface is much faster than the 2.0 transmission speed, it will not be described in detail.

Comparison of quality experience:

The 1080P is the biggest highlight of the Z6 meter. Compared to the 800P of the Q1, the Z6 has a greater advantage. In the current round of quality comparison, there was no doubt that the Z6 should be the winner without a doubt, but the result was surprising.

Before comparing the picture quality, we first understand the parameters of the next two projectors, God painted Q1 resolution 800P, brightness 1000ANSI lumens, DMD uses a 0.45DMD chip, the contrast ratio is 10000:1, and the polar meter Z6 resolution 1080P, brightness 700 ANSI lumens, DMD is using 0.33 DMD chip, the contrast ratio of 5000:1, then the two projector who projection effect will be better? Let's take a look at two renderings of the daytime curtains!

The following picture shows the effect of projected shooting during the day without pulling curtains. There is no need to compare it with the original image. Of course, we can see that the effect of the Q1 projection is better, whether it is a basket or a fruit. Clear, and the pole meter Z6 seems to be blocked by a layer of fog.

Let's take a look at the comparison chart of the blinds below. The effect of the 1000 ANSI lumens projected by the Q1 is much clearer than the 700 ANSI lumen projected by the Z6. It is not only clear because of the high lumens, but also the Q1. HDR10 high dynamic decoding technology, more clear and dark details.

Let's take a look at the two product launch pictures real shot map, shooting equipment + pictures, two devices are the same place with the same device to shoot out the same time.吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖 吖.

Let's take a look at this comparison chart, blue sky and white clouds, one look at the past, do not feel much difference between the two pictures, but you can see, God painted Q1 projection of the blue sky is more blue, white clouds are more white, and light and dark details are more Clearly, the quality of the projected images is particularly good. This is why I would recommend God to paint more Q1. We can see from the details how good a product is and how good the price is.

Let's take a look at this shot device + picture real shot map, the effect of the strawberry painted by the god Q1 projection looks very appetite, the texture of the basket is relatively clear, and the polar meter Z6 looks a bit bleak, a little vague feel.

After the actual measurement, the screen of the Z6 meter is not as good as the Q1. We can't help but ask, 800P's image quality is even better than 1080P? ! The actual shot shows you that this is a fact, and of course, the user himself can also compare the measured results.

So, I have to tell you, choose the projection, the preferred brightness. The reason why the test result is so is that the 0.33 DMD chip used in the Z6 is actually not a 1080P. Instead, it is a "flippery" 1080P. Its actual resolution is 0.45 DMD and a resolution of 800P. Drawing Q1 is close, and the Q1 picture quality with higher brightness is naturally better. With regard to the discussion of "shaking and shaking" 1080P within 3,000 yuan, it was very hot for some time ago.

Side shot experience comparison:

The side-shooting contrast is the part where the god Q1 is dominant. Will this reversal occur?

The God painting Q1 is equipped with 4D automatic trapezoidal correction technology originally created by Divine Image Technology. It can realize random shooting up and down and left and right. The screen is automatically changed to square, and any position angle is randomly placed. Just pressing the power button, the Q1 will automatically correct the square This kind of design solves the problem of screen distortion when the side projector is turned on. After the system is turned on, you can easily watch the HD square effect without manual adjustment. In the course of use, if the location of the Q1 painting changes, it will automatically trapezoidal, allowing users to freely change the viewing scene from the bedroom to the living room and study room. When the Z6 is turned on, there will be automatic focusing, but it does not support real-time Focusing, and does not support automatic keystone correction, need manual correction.

Zhai You also recorded a video to better understand the Q1 auto focus and 4D auto trapezoidal functions.吖 吖 吖 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动 移动.

Video connection:

System and resource comparison:

System: Both projectors are based on the Android system. The fluency is almost the same. Both resources are very rich in projection. Sohu video, Mango TV, Tate video, etc. are all available without worrying about insufficient resources. You can also use third-party software to watch more sources of resources and the like.

Through the display of dynamic graphs, it can be seen that the interface of Divine Art Q1 is relatively finely categorized, and it is easy to find the functions you want, for example, theaters, applications, documents, settings, simple and easy to use.

There is a wireless hotspot in the Q1 setting. There is still a wireless hotspot. The function is still very useful. For example, the projector itself sends a wireless hotspot signal, and the mobile phone is connected to a projected hotspot. It can achieve a one-touch screen function without WiFi. Can also complete the function. There is also a keystone correction function, the system automatically corrects by default, if you do not like it, you can also use the manual and fine-tuning features to adjust the effect you want.

It is worth mentioning that: In terms of system operation, Shenqi Q1 can use the remote controller to perform touch control operations. Just like operating a tablet computer, you can directly drag the UI to the left and right. The darker technology is the remote control. The mouse is used for manipulation, while the meter is operated by keys.

In order to better embody the characteristics of the product known by the deity Q1, there is a GIF map and a video dedicated to make it easier for you to understand the function of the Q1 touch screen. By entering the WiFi password you will find that the Q1 touch screen is faster and easier to enter, and the Z6 input is relatively slow. Whether it is to choose a movie or enter a password, God's drawing Q1 is a lot easier. Such a good design is worthy of praise for God.

Performance comparison:

He started to want to use An Bunny to perform a run-point comparison. Due to the compatibility issues of the Mi-Z6 software, there was no way to make comparisons. However, there was a score passed by the "Sofa Manager" device information, and from the score, Look, the Q1 score of God's painting is: 13550 points, and the score of Z6 is: 10085. In terms of performance, the Q1 painted by God is better than the Z6. And God painted the Q1 processing chip using T928, and the polar meter Z6 processing chip uses T820. Memory is used 2GB, but the storage area, the god of drawing Q1 uses 16GB, polar meters Z6 uses 8GB. God draws Q1 to store more space and download more movies or software.

Thermal temperature test:

Divine Q1 is equipped with a powerful Amlogic T928 chip, 4-core 64-bit processor, the performance is more stable, using dual-channel silent cooling design, good heat dissipation. Extremely good Z6 cooling and mute effect is also good, through the use of thermometer thermometer detection, the two temperatures are not much difference, God painted Q1 will be relatively better.

Comprehensive Comments:

The same 3,000 yuan projector, I think that God painting Q1 is more worthy of recommendation, the first is a better picture quality, in the support of 1000ANSI lumens and HDR technology, the actual picture quality performance of God painting Q1 is known as 1080P, brightness is only 700 The bright Z6 is even better; followed by the God Q1, it also uses 4D auto trapezoidal correction, which makes it easier for home users to use it and has a more convenient place to place. Not only is the boot up experience of Founder's high-definition large screen, but also during use. , If there is a change in position, will also 4D automatic trapezoidal correction, this too much convenience, no matter how placed, will automatically correct; From the hardware point of view, God painting Q1 is even better, 2GB+16GB, T968 processor; Finally From the outside, the divine painting Q1 is more in line with the expectation of a family projection.

Of course, each product has its own advantages, such as the extremely small and light Z6. Here, you can only give a reference to everyone, hoping to help you better understand the product's price/performance ratio and find the right projection for you.